Fashion fisticuffs- the Oscars

THEY'RE HERE, THEY'RE HERE! The Oscar dresses are here! while my favorite GoFugYourself is preparing its weekend dose of fashion mayhem thus being currently in full creative process i decided to give it a try on my own little blog. Drums drums drums...

The beautiful ones:

1) Sarah Jessica Parker in Chanel



Many fashion magazines have categorized this dress as a little on the fashion mayhem verge because of its unusual, straight cut and the rose detail. I find it absolutely stunning. It is very difficult for someone to look good in a dress like this because the large flowing material does not advantage all body types. But Sarah Jessica Parker can definitely pull it due to her petite frame. I love the satin, the pale golden-beige color, the suspended neck band instead of jewelry, the gray choice for the rose bouquet detail, the hair and the earrings. The cherry on the cake- the bangles. Absolutely unexpected jewelry choice that i think is astonishing. I'm going to keep this picture in my computer forever and ever in the hopes that one day some clever seamstress will manage to recreate this for me....oh the love! the splendor!


2) Kate Winslet in Yves Saint Laurent



I'm crazy about the squared angles of the corset and the necklace. The rectangular shape of the stone, the delicate thread of gold (or whatever that is) and the simplicity of the entire piece makes it just gorgeous. I love Kate's radiantly fresh complexion and the Lauren Bacall-esque hair gives her the '50's diva look. Love the lipstick as well, balances out the nude color of the dress. I'm not particularly crazy about the lower part of the gown, it could have been less delimited at the waist and look less like a long skirt, but the color choice downplays absolutely all the potential misfits. Love the elegant purse, not too big, not too tacky and small, but i would have really adored this ensemble if the dress didn't have the obvious front cut. And it's not that i dislike the shoes, but this kind of dress gives the impression it would really be striking if it covered everything and floated on the red carpet...


3) Elizabeth Banks in Versace



Elegant, delicate, a floating foam of a dress. The color in itself is not particularly beautiful, nor is the chest detail, but the baby blue-gray compliments EBanks' pale rosy skintone and gives the impression of a porcelain doll strolling down the red carpet. Love the hairstyle and jewelry choice, simple and extremely tasteful. 5 stars.


4) Amanda Seyfried in Armani



The former Mean Girl has indeed changed in terms of displaying an utter lack of even the tiniest drop of self-tanner. This celestial, almost bridal gown would look ridiculous on someone with Lindsay Lohan's orange-ness, for that matter. I love how the color of the dress compliments her pale complexion and the classiness of the hair do. I don't like the hippie handicraft bangle though, but this dress can definitely back up ANYTHING.


5) Helen Mirren in Badgley Mischka



I listed Helen because she is one of the most beautiful mature actresses in Hollywood and definitely the classiest. I am not crazy about the cut of the dress because the covered shoulders and the squared cleavage reek of grandma-ness, and it definitely doesn't suit Helen. But i absolutely adore her platinum blonde silver-ish hair and the sophisticated yet simple do. I like the large necklace as well, as i like the color of the dress and the large sparkles embedded in the fabric. Give a terribly youthful lift from the cookie-baking grandma cleavage design. Helen's makeup is impeccable, as usual, and her skin is positively glowing. A-amazing.

6) Vera Farmiga in Marchesa



Beautiful electric color that pops out in a youthful jazzy kind of way; the cut is absolutely fantastic and bold without spilling over the entire Lady Gaga scary monstrosity and the lipstick choice is definitely five stars- it doesn't look too much at all but it compliments Vera's pale complexion. I'm not crazy about the hair but with this kind of dress, playing low it's the best option. Thumbs up, class all the way. Loves it.

7) Diane Kruger in Chanel





I somehow love this dress. It looks like a giant slice of cake with loads and loads or cream and liquorish frosting but i really like it. It's again the Chanel signature pattern, making an astonishing gown in two colors only (neutrals this time, even lovelier) with a catchy and special design. I like the ribbon details on the back and the long satiny strings coming down to her hips. It has a theoretically simple design, being nothing more than a halter cocktail dress, but the ruffled pattern from the waist down is tasteful yet en vogue at the same time. A very eclectic design with gorgeous colors that perfectly suit Diane's skintone...and i also love her hair, simple and clean. The clutch is black and not cream, giving the entire outfit another point for minimalism. Diane looks like a beautiful Cinderella whose dreams are about to come true because Chanel spotted her while standing on the corner near the Beverly Center, selling newspapers, grabbed her delicious frame, put her in this gown and set her afloat on the red carpet. I think not everybody can pull up this look because you need that je ne sais quoi, that personality your dress will borrow, either attitude or grace, and Diane is undoubtedly a graceful presence.

The bad and the ugly:

1) Mariah Carey in Valentino



Okay someone must let Mimi know she's not at the 1994 Chattanooga High prom dance. The dress is first of all very similar to Gabourey Sidibe's. Then that color is NOT for the red carpet but for a '60's soviet flight attendant's uniform if you ask me. The horrendous 'jewelry' looks like something Madonna wore in the '80's 'Desperately Seeking Susan'. And the entire cut is just wrong, the lower front part is way too short and disrupts the entire appearance of a dress i'd otherwise dub as 'not a total eye sore'. It looks as if the seamstress didn't take the correct measurements and 5 minutes before the Oscars ceremony realized the front part is too short so decided to pin it up with her highschool beret broach. Eew.


2) Gabourey Sidibe in Marchesa



Say what??? ok i get it, nobody's gonna talk about the pink elephant in the room so i might as well be the first one. I am amazed that Perez Hilton thinks Gabourey looks 'amazing' in this..thing, and other fashion magazines dubbed the actress as 'stunningly looking'. First of all, the color choice is completely uninspired, more or less like Mariah Carey's. It doesn't go well with Gabourey's skintone, bringing out ashy undertones in her complexion. Secondly, the cut of the dress is definitely NOT suited for overweight-ness. I'm sorry if i can't be cosmetically-correct and refer to miss Sidibe as to 'a delicate feather' because she just isn't. Her body structure is extremely heavy and this dress choice doesn't advantage her at all. The fabric seems to have been washed over a thousand times because that color looks so tired, washed off and just irritatingly sad. Gabourey would have looked a thousand times better in something more appropriate for her body type and a nicer, livelier color. Her hair is also a disaster- Gabourey is a mature woman on a special night on the red carpet, not a 13 year-old on her pediatrician's visit. The bundled up fringe and the swept back unwashed hair just don't do her justice, making her face appear even rounder.


3) Miley Cyrus in Jenny Packham



It appears that nobody noticed Miley left the house wearing only the lower part of a nightgown and a bustier. The horrendous detail of the bustier, namely that puffy fluffy easter bunny lining of the cups is COMPLETELY inappropriate for Miley's age, not to mention tacky and cheap looking. It's like someone from her entourage ripped the fabric off an old prom dress and squeezed Miley in. Tisk tisk tisk. Definite no-no. I also hate the unwashed mohican hair do. Miley Cyrus has definitely grown up...in the wrong way this time.

4) Cameron Diaz in Oascar de la Renta



I have a love-hate relationship with this dress and with Cameron's overall appearance. While hating the lack of jewelry and the red lipstick on the paleness of her face, i like some of the details embroidered on the dress, the bold glitzy golden choice for the sewn details and the draped bottom of the dress.....i like the hair as well. It finally looks like Cameron has met the shampoo bottle. Howeverrrr...i don't like the fact that the overall impression this dress gives at a first glance is that it's been made from an old Studio 54 curtain and the pieces were sewn together 14 minutes before the ceremony. I mean it has no shape (simple is not always classy, Cameron!), no interesting detail and the color is just too floppy. This kind of dress should have been accessorized with some jewelry...or at least a more sophisticated hair do, like a majestic bun or something, you understand what i mean. Then another thing- i always get the feeling that Cameron Diaz looks well only in dresses that mirror extremes- either a surf-inspired chiffon pattern with a pashmina as a belt and fluorescent plastic bangles or long black chiffon gowns styled with pearls. She just has too much attitude to sport such a Cinderella gown and it really comes through, one can tell Cameron is somewhere in there, stuffed inside a glittery dress with some extensions on her head. It's just not her. And the makeup is boring (pale face and red lipstick looks good on pale-skinned people most of the times...), no blush, no nothing, just a neutral washed off tan. Uhm. I really don't like it. I've seen her glow in much prettier outfits (even jeans an a cotton tank top would work better than this dress, though it's a nice piece).

5) Demi Moore in Versace



Oh Demi. This is not an Oscars gown. You look too thin to even sport bare shoulders first of all. Your makeup is nonexistent (or looks like it, at least), your face and hair look like you just came back home after a long day of spinning, jogging and playing volleyball on the beach....or from the gym, your pick. This is a salsa club dress you wear when you go out with your friends to shake things up a little and dance your ruffled chiffon off. This is NOT glamor, it screams Cancun's Coco Bongo too much. A positive aspect is that the cognac of the dress blends in perfectly with the unhealthy fake tan. It looks like the ruffles on your legs are your real skin wrinkling and shriveling and falling off your eternally youthful body. So you could probably get in the DVD exercise industry much easier with this dress...if you want to. Seriously.

6) Rachel McAdams in Elie Saab



Imagine Neytiri from Avatar got on planet Earth. This is what she would look like if suffering from a skin infection and wearing someone's old kitchen curtains as a dress. I really don't understand how could Elie Saab create this kind of disaster and how could someone wear it.

7) Elisabetta Canalis in God knows what



Elisabetta is in a desperate need for three things to look at least decent: a shampoo bottle, a hair brush and A BRA, FOR GOD'S SAKE!! she might also want to consider a TV guide subscription so she'd learn that Baywatch is no longer on air for quite a long time so that extremely tasteful tattoo would look much better under twelve layers of industrial strength concealer. Oh and the dress- i don't like the color, the cleavage is way too low and i'm sure the entire ensemble will successfully help her blend in perfectly with the chair paddings.

8) Penelope Cruz in Donna Karan



In 1980's Eastern Europe the epitome of interior design sophistication was considered to be having thick burgundy drapes on your windows. It is no longer the case of course, but Penelope looks like she's wearing one of the discarded pieces. The iron curtain has fallen quite a while ago, bb. Move on.

9) Jennifer Lopez in Armani



I think J.Lo went to her Wal-Mart from the block, got herself some bubble wrap and decided to wear it by twisting it around herself and making a nice ribbon on the left side. It didn't work out because the wrap curled and flattened out so J.Lo was left with some fluffy waves. Sigh. The earrings scream 'secretary at the company's Christmas party' and what's with the hair? is she getting bald or did she chop it off? good luck next time, J.Lo. I'm a big fan of hers but this time it's a one step for J.Lo, a giant leap for the fug.

10) Nicole Richie in Reem Acra



Uhm. I don't mean to be mean (hehe...) but Nicole totally looks like a malnourished kid whom Madonna has grabbed and wrapped in the first warm thing she could get, namely an old psychedelic wannabe-classy blanket with golden threads her grandma knitted once upon a time. Nicole's tiny little frame looks way bundled up for the LA weather forecast of the past three hundred years and the looseness of the dress doesn't help either. It's like a Woodstock songstress was teleported in Beverly Hills after someone washed her hair and reminded her to pose nicely and not flash the middle finger for the Vietnam or John Lennon cause...you get my point. I really don't like the color choice, Nicole's complexion would have glowed in a stronger and more youthful color, and the fabric looks too thick at the most superficial look. Like a combo between a fashionable Eskimo and one of Charlie Manson's ex lovers. Brrr. And for pete's sake, Nicole, eat a burger!

11) Virginia Madsen in something



Okay honey we need to talk. It's highly probable the night before the ceremony you fell asleep on your couch watching North and South and somehow in your sleep, you managed to communicate your desires and inspiration to your assistant who ran to the closest bridal shop (in the middle of the night, of course), broke the window, picked up the first gown, came back running, threw it in the washing machine together with some black dye and in the morning you had a new, all wrinkled black bridal gown ready to bewilder the red carpet. No no no, honey. It doesn't work like that. The upper part of the dress DOES look like a late '80's bride's blackened gown, and the lower part is a total disaster, like a southern belle's puffy skirt with lace applications...or a Louisiana mansion curtain set? I can't decide.
...and what's with the bangs? and the powdered makeup? and the pale burgundish-pink lipstick? and THE BELT? holy crap, i almost forgot about that.
seriously Vinny. sack the stylist. you're a beautiful woman with a gorgeous body and amazing hair and everything and you pull up that Paula Abdul-in-the-cartoon-music-video look...i'm disappointed. completely.

Product rave- Isadora 16hrs Active Moist Make-up SPF 30

I have to write about this foundation because i think it is an AMAZING, AMAZING product. I came across the only review this foundation has on Makeupalley because i was looking for opinions since this little wonderful thing is on sale at Kicks. I'm surprised there is only one review of this (or there was, last time i checked) because i think this foundation has serious Dior dupe potential. I went on and bought it after trying it on my wrist (sometimes it's even useless to test foundations inside the store...i already have makeup on, the lighting is bad, etc), seeing the price, the ingredients and especially the SPF of 30.



Packaging: I love the long flesh-colored tube and i especially love the pump. It's very similar to Chanel Mat Lumiere's and it allows for perfect control of the quantity. Half a pump is enough for half my face, a little extra being required to cover up spots or undereye circles. I don't need concealer with this foundation, which only happens when i use Estee Lauder's Double Wear. Of course that this foundation, being a drugstore product, does not compare too much with ELDW, but there are some similarities. It has 30 ml.

Price: not dirt cheap, i paid the equivalent of 12 euros. While being a little pricey for a drugstore foundation (as all European drugstore products are), it is definitely worth all the money.

Color: the shade range is quite limited as this foundation comes in only six shades. However, the striking thing about this foundation is that it appears to perfectly suit both cold undertoned complexions as well as warm skintones. I am a MacNW30-35 and i am currently using shade 33 Honey Beige. While on my extremely pale wrist it came out a little darker, it blends beautifully on my face and i don't even see the face-neck border line. As i mentioned, i think the colors go towards beige-peachy undertones, not orange at all, yet they are perfectly suitable for warm skintones as well. Definitely a winner.

Application: the tube reads 'shake well before use'; i applied it with my fingers with no messiness whatsoever. It feels very creamy on the fingers yet has a runny consistency, pretty much like the Dior Diorskin Forever; i think it's just a little thicker than that. It doesn't streak, doesn't cake around pores or fine lines, it looks very well around my hairline (NOTHING works for me in that area, i always have to blend the foundation with a wet sponge and get my baby hairs messed up).

Coverage: it definitely qualifies as three-quarters medium coverage (the other quarter being sheer). It covered my dark circles although i always need concealer and it also covered my spots. However, it did not completely erase any track of blemish off my face, so i dare say it's definitely not full coverage. What i mostly like about it is that it lives up to its name. While not being able to physically measure the degree of moisture in my skin (who can do that??? why did i say that? it's stoopid!), i can honestly say this stuff doesn't feel like makeup at all. It has a very light consistency and a healthy matte finish. However, this only comes if you shake the tube very well before use otherwise it can feel a little drying (the ingredients must blend properly). I was looking for a natural, light finish makeup with decent coverage and low pocket-burning properties because i desperately need something to mix my Estee Lauder Double Wear with (that stuff is amazing but feels like cement), and also needed an everyday workable foundation for school days or moments when i'm on the run.
This is my left cheek with no makeup on:



With one layer of Isadora foundation (half a pump):



The pic might appear a little bit blurry because i tried to fix the image on the macro mode, to get a very clear close-up, but i still can't figure things out with my new camera. However,i absolutely did not blur the image; this is what it looks like in plain Swedish morning light (cold light), no flash, in front of the window.

I have also uploaded two pics of my left wrist before and after. Pictures taken in daylight, in front of the window, no flash. Before:



and after:



(Sorry about the cracks in my skin, this is a close-up and my face definitely doesn't look like that with this foundation on. The image is much clear because it's easier to hold a camera at the perfect distance from the wrist than from half of the face.)

Stay on power: three out of five. It looks beautiful and doesn't transfer on clothes but comes off if you rub your fingers on the skin. I'm guessing it might also be the case with other activities such as kissing; i have tested it while clubbing and again, the verdict is 3 out of 5. While looking beautifully when i left the house and staying on 100% for about 3 hours, it started looking a bit too transparent after a while. However, it is highly blendable and you can retouch your makeup with your fingertips. I don't feel like needing powder with this foundation (though i don't use powder with any other product because i think it dries out my skin and makes me look older).

This is a clearer picture of my cheek this morning after i put on a little more foundation for going to classes. It is a little more quantity, a bit more than half a pump plus a little extra dabbing under the eyes (my problem areas together with the nose redness):



The color is extremely natural and peachy-rosy and i find it adorable. I have slightly oily skin especially on my t-zone but i don't use powder anymore. This foundation has an immense fixing and covering potential for a drugstore product. Here are two photos of me 5 minutes ago, 23.53 local time. I did not retouch my foundation today and i still haven't used powder. You'll notice some shine but that's my medium oiliness coming through and it doesn't look that bad in reality. I prefer the dewy, shinier finish much more than the extremely matte and powdered one because the latter just doesn't look good on everyone, looks unnatural and ages the face, not to mention that it over dries the skin.





I have used only the tiniest amount of concealer, the Isadora concealer stick, and i have been wearing this foundation (without powder on top, i repeat) all day long. The concealer is not heavy duty coverage and i kept blending it in with my fingertips all day long because of some unwanted eye pencil smudging i had to clean. Notice the slightly red eyes-that's the continuous dabbing plus the drying central heating in my department's classroom. The skintone appears to be downright yellow with some greenness in it because i took the picture without a flash, in a yellow lamp light. I wanted to get all the details as accurately as possible so that's why i have a yellow face. The color of the foundation is by no means that.

Miscellaneous: contains zinc, urea-that helps with the moisture balance, almond oil, pomegranate extract and marine bacterium ferment (Pseudoalteromonas is the scientific name, checked it up and it is a bacteria responsible with producing antifungal and antibacterial molecules). Does not contain perfume but it has the most amazing scent i have ever found in a foundation,an extremely faint odor of fresh laundry. I love it. It didn't irritate my skin, didn't cause breakouts. Has an SPF of 30 which is a huge plus for me because regular sun protection dries out my skin and forms a very light, almost white film on my skin that i don't really like and find difficult to blend in with any makeup product. So this is a great plus.

some of the ingredients (the European version of the product): aqua, isododecane, titanium dioxide, cyclopentasiloxane, ethylhexyl, methoxycinnamate, polyglyceryl, triisostearate, mica, glycerin, dimethicone/sorbitan stearate copolymer, zinc stearate, prunus amygdalus dulcis oil, punica granatum extract, pseudoalteromonas ferment extract, fructose, glucose, sucrose, xanthan gum, tocopherol, dextrin, alanine, glutamic acid, aspartic and other substances i get tired of typing.

Therefore...: I will definitely continue purchasing it. It seems to be the only foundation i can mix my ELDW with (anything else cakes), has decent coverage, hydrates my skin and looks very fresh. 4 stars out of 5. Now, coming back home after a day of work and stress and everything, i absolutely love the coverage and the hydrating sensation this foundation gives, and i seriously believe it is better than my Diorskin Forever. I dare to say that to me it presents itself as a strong candidate for Estee Lauder's Double Wear dupe.

Just remember- shake well before use!

Makeup fisticuffs-sack the stylist, Kim K!

Oh oh oh. I decided to blog about this kind of stuff every month or week, depending on my bitchiness at the specific time. The reason for doing this is something i've mentioned before, namely the well known impossibility of normal people to follow the standards imposed by celebs, especially when those standards are not even real most of the time. I want to talk about Kim Kardashian because i think many girls my age can identify themselves with her from various perspectives- she's young, with a passion for fashion, wannabe glamazon and darling of the makeup artists. I am a follower of Kim's makeup artist's blog, Mario,like most of the beauty bloggers here. However talented Mario is, Kim's makeup style dangerously lingers in that gray zone between dramatic and tacky; i personally love some traits of her makeup looks, like the lashes or the kajal, but still wonder at some others, like the heaviness and falseness of the foundation and bronzer.

While reading miss Kim's blog i couldn't help at gasping with surprise at a certain post that really caught my eye- Kim posted some photos of her outside a Hollywood restaurant and after the usual fashion and 'you guys, totally you guys' chit chat, she dropped the bomb- claimed wearing absolutely no makeup. Amazeballs!!!!

Okay, but first of all, the usual makeup talk. Sort of an in-and-out thing:

In: Kim's natural traits, namely the gorgeous Bambi eyes that don't need that much makeup to begin with.

Out: damn,that in thing was pretty short! well a list of the outies would be the tranny false lashes, the smudged crayon, the overly contoured eyebrows and the heavy plum eyeshadow.




I actually don't even know for sure if the eyeshadow she's wearing in the first pic is navy, or dark brown, or downright black, because i can't see through the heavy duty eyeliner and the eyebrows. It's just too much, a total disaster, i really think it's a bad example of 'smoky' eye makeup. As for the foundation, what type does she use? In this unphotoshopped picture it appears to be very visible, heavy, caked in the pores of her skin and unnaturally bordering the cheek makeup. That one is absolutely wrong as well- not only it's too much, but i guess her makeup artist didn't use a primer (or Kim must have very oily skin) because the blush and bronzer appear to have gunked and streaked on her cheeks big time.
And for the love of god...what's with the upper lip? is it just me or that little spot looks like it needs some serious waxing? the foundation has clearly not been blended properly in that area giving the look of a serious mustache. Combined with the pearly pale lipstick (that looks dry-yet-oily, emphasizing the cracks of the lips and appearing cakey)it really makes Kim look either sick, in disguise for a Halloween carnival or just a victim of her makeup artist.

Then there was the 'blonde' look:







Before anything else...





Kim, that is NOT blonde. It is an artistically executed orange with beautiful highlights, but it looks like a worn out hemp mop. It's just one of the major disasters i have ever seen. Not to mention the thick black eyebrows...that fortunately have not been colored in the same nuance as the hair, although one's hair must somehow match the eyebrows. It would have been worse to see Kim sporting a pair of orange caterpillars on her forehead. However, who is her stylist? i forgot to check up the details because i was shocked when coming across this photo. I just can't understand how this was possible. You're a celebrity, you can afford a top stylist! If natural black hair can be transformed into beautiful, naturally-looking glossy waves, i.e. Jennifer Aniston, then THAT's a great colorist...whose number you should have struggled a little bit more to get. Sigh sigh and triple sigh.


Then there was THIS:



Okay Kim seriously needs to subscribe to Pixiwoo's blog. Makeup is supposed to bring out your natural features, to make your skin glow and enhance the natural beauty one has. Whoever did her makeup clearly used too much white powder under the eyes and, i assume, unsuccessfully tried to blend it out, resulting in a multi-layered white mess. It's just too much and it doesn't even match her skintone- notice the orange fake baked body.

However i don't totally dislike this look:



This is the only photo of Kim in which her skin is visible through the foundation layer. It looks fresh, natural, not overly done, with the slightest hint of contouring powder/blusher, whatever they used. It's even hard to figure it out which is exactly what makeup is supposed to be like. The cherry, almost russian red lipstick is a great color option that compliments both her natural mouth shape and the skintone, as well as the dark hair, giving the entire look a splash of that classic '50's glam. However, the eyebrows are again overdone. While i love their natural shape (i'm currently growing mine out hoping to get my natural shape 100% back), they appear too thick and having the wrong arch- thick eyebrows should be carefully angled otherwise one ends up with the Camilla Belle look. Kim's brows have been plucked at the wrong angle and give her a severe, '50's boarding school teacher look.

(Her eyebrows look much better here:



While clearly overfilled, the arch is symmetrically shaped and synchronizes the eye socket)

Then there was the Angry Chola look:



Daylight doesn't go that well with Kim's makeup galore. The eyes appear all wrinkled around and squinting while wearing thick black kajal doesn't help at all. The eyebrows are again too thick and too black and the sheerness of the blusher makes the face look plain and tired. Not to mention that huge hoop earrings plus swept back unwashed hair- too '90's.


Then Kim blogged about this look...claiming she was wearing no makeup:







While i kinda like the outfit, i don't see why Kim would lie on her blog, to her readers, claiming she was bare faced when her foundation shines like a light bulb and the bronzer is visible for a mile or two. She has her eyebrows (beautifully) done, as she should always have them, and i can also see a lot of nude lipstick (eew for that purple-ish nude. i really don't like it. brings out even non-existing paleness and makes the teeth look yellow and their owner look sick) and clearly some serious mascara. This is what natural makeup looks on Kim, enhancing her natural features and making her claim she wears none. Being used to wearing a ton of makeup every day has made Kim believe more is less, more is better. Touche honey, touche. It really isn't the case to lie. I seriously got pissed off when reading the words 'me without makeup on'. THIS is what your bare face looks like, bb, in case you have forgotten:







I think that Kim is a very beautiful girl especially without makeup on. of course that she has a few little spots and blemishes, like every normal person, but her skin is pretty much healthy and i love the natural eyebrows and lashes. Therefore miz K has no reason to go around lying.

so yeah. today's makeup catharsis completed. stay tuned.